Bull v. City of Quincy

60 Ill. App. 165, 1894 Ill. App. LEXIS 666
CourtAppellate Court of Illinois
DecidedJune 13, 1895
StatusPublished

This text of 60 Ill. App. 165 (Bull v. City of Quincy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bull v. City of Quincy, 60 Ill. App. 165, 1894 Ill. App. LEXIS 666 (Ill. Ct. App. 1895).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The contract involved in this case was before the Supreme Court in the case of L. & W. Bull v. The City of Quincy, lately decided, and it was there held that the cost of special eastings in the mains, and of the pipes leading from the mains to the bills at the base of the hydrants, were proper items to be considered in ascertaining the cost of putting in the hydrants. The construction thus placed upon the contract is binding upon us in the present case, and it follows that we must hold, contrary to our first impression, that instruction bio. 1, given for the plaintiff, was erroneous in this respect.

For such error the judgment must he reversed and the cause remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
60 Ill. App. 165, 1894 Ill. App. LEXIS 666, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bull-v-city-of-quincy-illappct-1895.