Bull v. City and County of San Francisco
This text of 558 F.3d 887 (Bull v. City and County of San Francisco) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Mary BULL; Jonah Zern, and all others similarly situated; Laura Timbrook; Leigh Fleming; Charli Johnson; Micky Mangosing; Alexis Bronson; Marcy Corneau; Lisa Giampaoli, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO; San Francisco County Sheriff's Department; Michael Hennessey, Sheriff; San Francisco County Sheriff's Deputies, Defendants-Appellants.
Mary Bull; Jonah Zern, and all others similarly situated; Laura Timbrook; Leigh Fleming; Charli Johnson; Micky Mangosing; Alexis Bronson; Marcy Corneau; Lisa Giampaoli, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
City and County of San Francisco; San Francisco County Sheriff's Department; Michael Hennessey, Sheriff; San Francisco County Sheriff's Deputies, Defendants-Appellants.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Mark E. Merin, Esquire, Law Offices of Mark E. Merin, Sacramento, CA, Andrew Charles Schwartz, Casper Meadows *888 Schwartz, PC, Walnut Creek, CA, for Plaintiffs-Appellees.
Robert Andres Bonta, Esquire, David B. Newdorf, Esquire, San Francisco City Attorney's Office, San Francisco, CA, for Defendants-Appellants.
CV-03-01840-CRB/EMC.
ORDER
KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:
Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
558 F.3d 887, 2009 WL 467310, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bull-v-city-and-county-of-san-francisco-ca9-2009.