Bulkley v. Moses

23 N.Y.S. 125, 23 N.Y. Civ. Proc. R. 28
CourtNew York City Court
DecidedApril 13, 1892
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 23 N.Y.S. 125 (Bulkley v. Moses) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York City Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bulkley v. Moses, 23 N.Y.S. 125, 23 N.Y. Civ. Proc. R. 28 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1892).

Opinion

CLEMEUT, 0. J.

I am inclined to follow the decision in Copley v. Hay, (Com. Pl. N. Y.) 12 N. Y. Supp. 277. When money is deposited, the foreclosure is against the fund. Ward v. Kilpatrick, 85 N. Y. 413, 418. When a bond is given, as in this case, the lien is discharged, and the lienor cannot foreclose against the land, and may sue upon the bond., The owners or persons against whom the lien is filed execute a bond with two or more sureties in order to' cancel the same. If the owner and contractor are different persons, and the contractor files a bond, the owner has no interest thereafter, for the lien is discharged.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sheffield v. Early
25 N.Y.S. 1098 (New York Supreme Court, 1893)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
23 N.Y.S. 125, 23 N.Y. Civ. Proc. R. 28, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bulkley-v-moses-nycityct-1892.