Bulk Transport Corp. v. Public Utilities Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Bulk Transport Corp. v. Public Utilities Commission

175 Ohio St. (N.S.) 29

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided June 5, 1963·No. No. 37894·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The findings and order of the commission are not unreasonable or unlawful. The order of the Public Utilities Commission is affirmed on authority of Wooster Freight Lines, Inc., v. Public Utilities Commission, 163 Ohio St., 11.

Order affirmed.

Taft, C. J., Zimmerman, Matthias, O’Neill, Griffith, Herbert and Smith, JJ., concur. Smith, J., of the Sixth Appellate District, sitting by designation in the place and stead of Gibson, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The findings and order of the commission are not unreasonable or unlawful. The order of the Public Utilities Commission is affirmed on authority of Wooster Freight Lines, Inc., v. Public Utilities Commission, 163 Ohio St., 11.

Order affirmed.

Taft, C. J., Zimmerman, Matthias, O’Neill, Griffith, Herbert and Smith, JJ., concur. Smith, J., of the Sixth Appellate District, sitting by designation in the place and stead of Gibson, J.

Bulk Transport Corp. v. Public Utilities Commission, 175 Ohio St. (N.S.) 29 (Ohio 1963).

Pincite

175 Ohio St. (N.S.) 29 (Bulk Transport Corp. v. Public Utilities Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.