BULIC v. State

254 S.W.3d 916, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 774, 2008 WL 2346207
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 10, 2008·No. ED 89967·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Dzevad Bulic appeals from the motion court’s denial, following an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BULIC v. State, 254 S.W.3d 916, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 774, 2008 WL 2346207 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

254 S.W.3d 916 (BULIC v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Johnson
254 S.W.3d 916 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2008)