Bulger v. . the Albany Railway

42 N.Y. 459, 1870 N.Y. LEXIS 67
New York Court of Appeals·Decided June 21, 1870·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

By the Court—Lott, J.

The child was killed while in the street unprotected, and the court nonsuited the plaintiff. I find nothing in the case to charge either the conductor or driver with negligence. Assuming that the child was off the sidewalk, and as far into the street as the west rail of the east track, there is nothing to show that there was any necessity at that point to stop the car, as the child was not then in a position of danger from the car. The evidence leads to the conclusion, and the only one warranted by the evidence is, that the fore part of the car passed the child safely, and the child must have then run or fell under. For this, under the circumstances, the defendants are not responsible.

The nonsuit was right, and judgment must be affirmed.

For affirmance, Earl, Ch. J., Lott, Grover, Foster and Smith, JJ.

For reversal, Hunt and Sutherland, JJ.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bulger v. . the Albany Railway, 42 N.Y. 459, 1870 N.Y. LEXIS 67 (N.Y. 1870).

42 N.Y. 459 (Bulger v. . the Albany Railway) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ryan v. Milwaukee Northern Railway Co.
203 N.W. 340 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1925)
Hamilton v. Birmingham Ry. L. & P. Co.
73 So. 950 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1917)
South Chicago City Ry. Co. v. Kinnare
96 Ill. App. 210 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1901)
Calumet Electric Street Railway Co. v. Van Pelt
68 Ill. App. 582 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1897)
Gallaher v. Crescent City Rail Road
37 La. Ann. 288 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1885)
In re Park
1 How. Pr. (n.s.) 257 (New York Supreme Court, 1885)
Chicago & Alton Railroad v. Lammert
12 Ill. App. 408 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1883)
Schwier ex rel. Schwier v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad
22 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 572 (New York Supreme Court, 1878)