Bulgarin ex rel. Bulgarin v. Smallman

642 So. 2d 147, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 9025, 1994 WL 511217
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 21, 1994·No. No. 93-588·Published

Opinion

GREEN, Judge.

Christopher A. Bulgarin, Victor Bulgarin and Edith Bulgarin (collectively, plaintiffs) appeal an adverse summary judgment in their action for negligence against Bernice Smallman and Richard Smallman (collectively, defendants). We reverse.

Plaintiffs essentially argue that the trial court abused its discretion when it rejected their affidavit in opposition to defendants’ motion for summary judgment as untimely. We find that we need not reach this issue because even in the absence of plaintiffs’ affidavit, there were still genuine issues of material fact to preclude the entry of summary judgment in favor of defendants. Holl v. Talcott, 191 So.2d 40 (Fla.1966); Ramos v. Wright Superior, Inc., 610 So.2d 46 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992).

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bulgarin ex rel. Bulgarin v. Smallman, 642 So. 2d 147, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 9025, 1994 WL 511217 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

642 So. 2d 147 (Bulgarin ex rel. Bulgarin v. Smallman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ramos v. Wright Superior, Inc.
610 So. 2d 46 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)