Bulgari v. Bulgari

Opinion

GIBS ON DUNN USL. SUNT Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP DOCUMENT 200 Park Avenue ELECTRONICALLY FILED re1212.951.4000 DOC #: gibsondunn.com ED: Mitchell A. Kar! DATE FILED:_ 12/28/2023 Dineet 41 012 361.3807 Fax: +1 212.351 5254 December 21, 2023 MKarlan@gibsondunn.com Granted. Hon. Robert W. Lehrburger . . SO ORDERED: United States District Court je — Southern District of New York 12/28/2023 500 Pearl Street HON. ROBERT W. LEHRBURGER New York, NY 10007 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Re: Matter of Bulgari v. Bulgari, No. 1:22-cv-05072-LGS-RWL Dear Judge Lehrburger: The undersigned firms are counsel for Defendant Veronica Bulgari, in her capacity as Trustee of the Anna Bulgari Family Trusts in the above-captioned case. Pursuant to Your Honor’s Rules for Redactions and Filing Under Seal, the parties met and conferred regarding “whether any or all of the redacted material” filed in connection with Defendant’s Reply Memorandum of Law in Further Support of Her Motion for Summary Judgment “may or must be filed without redaction.” Consistent with the Court’s prior sealing orders (see ECF Nos. 343 & 380) and the parties’ prior agreements, Defendant respectfully request the Court enter an order sealing the following categories of information in the documents filed under provisional seal at ECF Nos. 384, 385, 385-4, 385-7, 385-8, 385-9, 385-10, 385-11, 385-12, and 386: 1. Bank account numbers (other than the last three digits or letters) 2. Personal taxpayer-identification numbers (other than the last three digits) 3. Personal addresses (redacting only the street number and apartment number) 4. Personal non-work email addresses Defendant proposes narrowly tailored redactions consistent with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Second Circuit precedent. The Federal Rules permit redactions to taxpayer-identification numbers and financial-account numbers. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2(a)(1), (4). Further, courts in this district have found that private information, such as personal home addresses and personal (non-work) email addresses, is sealable. See, e.g., Valassis Commc’ns, Inc. v. News Corp., 2020 WL 2190708, at *4 (S.D.N_Y. May 5, 2020) (holding that personal information such as cell phone numbers and home addresses should remain sealed); Farstein v. Netflix, Inc., 2023 WL 6164293, *3 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 21, 2023) (sealing the personal contact information of non-parties). Plaintiff does not oppose the requested relief. Accordingly, for the reasons set forth above, Defendant respectfully requests that the Court grant this motion to seal. Defendant will also submit the documents it seeks to seal with Abu Dhabi - Beijing - Brussels « Century City - Dallas - Denver + Dubai - Frankfurt * Hong Kong - Houston « London - Los Angeles Munich - New York « Orange County « Palo Alto - Paris San Francisco - Singapore « Washington, D.C.

GIBSON DUNN

Hon. Robert W. Lehrburger Southern District of New York December 21, 2023 Page 2

proposed redactions to the Court via email.

Respectfully submitted, /s/ Mitchell A. Karlan Mitchell A. Karlan James L. Hallowell GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP 200 Park Avenue New York, NY 10166 T: 212-351-3827 mkarlan@gibsondunn.com jhallowell@gibsondunn.com

/s/ Michael M. Rosensaft Michael M. Rosensaft KATTEN MUCHIN ROSENMAN LLP 50 Rockefeller Plaza New York, NY 10020 T: 212-940-8800 michael.rosensaft@katten.com Attorneys for Defendant Veronica Bulgari cc: All counsel of record (via ECF).