Bulen v. Moody

63 N.E.2d 244, 43 Ohio Law. Abs. 608, 1945 Ohio App. LEXIS 1137
CourtOhio Court of Appeals
DecidedMay 16, 1945
DocketNo. 3766
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 63 N.E.2d 244 (Bulen v. Moody) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bulen v. Moody, 63 N.E.2d 244, 43 Ohio Law. Abs. 608, 1945 Ohio App. LEXIS 1137 (Ohio Ct. App. 1945).

Opinion

OPINION

BY THE COURT:

Submitted on motion of defendants-appellees to strike the bill of exceptions from the files for the reason that it was not filed in the Common Pleas Court within forty days from the judgment and the entry overruling the motion for new trial.

The motion will be sustained upon the authority of In re Lowry, 140 Oh St 223; Western Reserve Mutual Casualty Co. v Holstein, 72 Oh. Ap. 65; State, ex rel. Merion v Van Sickle, et al., 42 Abs. 33, 59 N. E. (2d), 383.

HORNBECK, P J., GEIGER and MILLER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Davis v. Davis
90 N.E.2d 875 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1949)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
63 N.E.2d 244, 43 Ohio Law. Abs. 608, 1945 Ohio App. LEXIS 1137, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bulen-v-moody-ohioctapp-1945.