Bulen v. Moody
This text of 63 N.E.2d 244 (Bulen v. Moody) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION
Submitted on motion of defendants-appellees to strike the bill of exceptions from the files for the reason that it was not filed in the Common Pleas Court within forty days from the judgment and the entry overruling the motion for new trial.
The motion will be sustained upon the authority of In re Lowry, 140 Oh St 223; Western Reserve Mutual Casualty Co. v Holstein, 72 Oh. Ap. 65; State, ex rel. Merion v Van Sickle, et al., 42 Abs. 33, 59 N. E. (2d), 383.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
63 N.E.2d 244, 43 Ohio Law. Abs. 608, 1945 Ohio App. LEXIS 1137, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bulen-v-moody-ohioctapp-1945.