Home/Supreme Court of New Jersey/Bulat v. Londrigan

Bulat v. Londrigan

60 A. 1133, 65 N.J. Eq. 718, 20 Dickinson 718, 1903 N.J. LEXIS 314
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided June 19, 1903·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from is affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion of Vice-Chancellor Pitney, delivered by him in the court of chancery, and reported in 18 Dick. Ch. Rep. 22.

For affirmance — The Ciiiee-Justice, Van Syckel, Dixon, Garrison, Fort, Garretson, Swayze, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Voori-iees, Vroom — 11. For reversal — Hendrickson—1.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bulat v. Londrigan, 60 A. 1133, 65 N.J. Eq. 718, 20 Dickinson 718, 1903 N.J. LEXIS 314 (N.J. 1903).

60 A. 1133 (Bulat v. Londrigan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Evcco Leasing Corp.
828 F.2d 188 (Third Circuit, 1987)
EVCCO Leasing Corp. v. Ace Trucking Co.
828 F.2d 188 (Third Circuit, 1987)
Raniere v. I & M INVESTMENTS INC.
387 A.2d 1254 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1978)
Alt v. Kwiatek
17 A.2d 161 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1941)