Home/Supreme Court of New Jersey/Bulat v. Londrigan

Bulat v. Londrigan

60 A. 1133, 65 N.J. Eq. 718, 20 Dickinson 718, 1903 N.J. LEXIS 314
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedJune 19, 1903
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 60 A. 1133 (Bulat v. Londrigan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bulat v. Londrigan, 60 A. 1133, 65 N.J. Eq. 718, 20 Dickinson 718, 1903 N.J. LEXIS 314 (N.J. 1903).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from is affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion of Vice-Chancellor Pitney, delivered by him in the court of chancery, and reported in 18 Dick. Ch. Rep. 22.

For affirmance — The Ciiiee-Justice, Van Syckel, Dixon, Garrison, Fort, Garretson, Swayze, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Voori-iees, Vroom — 11. For reversal — Hendrickson—1.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Evcco Leasing Corp.
828 F.2d 188 (Third Circuit, 1987)
EVCCO Leasing Corp. v. Ace Trucking Co.
828 F.2d 188 (Third Circuit, 1987)
Raniere v. I & M INVESTMENTS INC.
387 A.2d 1254 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1978)
Alt v. Kwiatek
17 A.2d 161 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1941)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
60 A. 1133, 65 N.J. Eq. 718, 20 Dickinson 718, 1903 N.J. LEXIS 314, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bulat-v-londrigan-nj-1903.