Bujac v. Morgan
3 Yeates 258
Opinion
The defendant cannot be arrested, because not within the state; he is not subject to a domestic attachment, because he has not absconded ; nor to a foreign attachment, because clearly he is an inhabitant of the state. 1 Dali. 153. His home is within'the city of Philadelphia.
The rule must be discharged.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bujac v. Morgan, 3 Yeates 258 (Pa. 1801).
3 Yeates 258 (Bujac v. Morgan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Lancaster Trust Co. v. Bertz
12 Pa. D. & C. 155 (Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas, 1928)
Fillman's Appeal
99 Pa. 286 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1882)
Winrow v. Raymond
4 Pa. 501 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1846)
Case v. Hufty
1 U.S. 154 (Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas, 1785)