Buitrago v. Landry's

Supreme Court of Florida

Buitrago v. Landry's

3 So. 3d 1192, 34 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 246, 2009 Fla. LEXIS 258, 2009 WL 465767

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedFebruary 26, 2009

DocketNo. SC07-762

StatusPublished

This text of 3 So. 3d 1192 (Buitrago v. Landry's) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Buitrago v. Landry's, 3 So. 3d 1192, 34 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 246, 2009 Fla. LEXIS 258, 2009 WL 465767 (Fla. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We have for review Buitrago v. Landry’s, 949 So.2d 1046 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006), in which the First District Court of Appeal certified a question of great public importance. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § (3)(b)(4), Fla. Const.

We stayed proceedings in this case pending our disposition of Murray v. Mariner Health, 994 So.2d 1051 (Fla.2008). When our Murray decision became final, we issued an order directing respondents in the present case to show cause why we should not exercise jurisdiction, summarily quash the decision being reviewed, and remand for reconsideration in light of our decision in Murray. Respondents did not file a response.

Accordingly, we grant the petition for review in this ease, quash the decision below, and remand for reconsideration upon application of our decision in Murray.

It is so ordered.

[1193]*1193QUINCE, C.J., and WELLS, PARIENTE, LEWIS, CANADY, POLSTON, and LABARGA, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI