Builtland Partners v. Jack LaLanne Biltmore Health Spa, Inc.
489 N.E.2d 1298, 66 N.Y.2d 1006, 499 N.Y.S.2d 396, 1985 N.Y. LEXIS 18355
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, with costs (see, Rice v Ritz Assoc., 58 NY2d 923, affg 88 AD2d 513; Matter of Penn Cent. Corp. [Consolidated Rail Corp.], 56 NY2d 120; 8 Weinstein-Korn-Miller, NY Civ Prac ¶¶ 7601.02, 7601.04).
Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Jasen, Meyer, Simons, Kaye, Alexander and Titone.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Builtland Partners v. Jack LaLanne Biltmore Health Spa, Inc., 489 N.E.2d 1298, 66 N.Y.2d 1006, 499 N.Y.S.2d 396, 1985 N.Y. LEXIS 18355 (N.Y. 1985).
489 N.E.2d 1298 (Builtland Partners v. Jack LaLanne Biltmore Health Spa, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Grosz v. Serge Sabarsky, Inc.
24 A.D.3d 264 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Leo Hurwitz v. The United States of America and the Central Intelligence Agency
884 F.2d 684 (Second Circuit, 1989)