Building Owners & Managers Ass'n v. City of Pittsburgh

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Building Owners & Managers Ass'n v. City of Pittsburgh

957 A.2d 228, 598 Pa. 382, 2008 Pa. LEXIS 1570

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided September 24, 2008·No. Petition Nos. 353 and 354 WAL 2007·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW this 24th day of September, 2008, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby GRANTED. The issue, as stated by Petitioners, is:

Whether the Commonwealth Court’s opinion conflicts with the Home Rule law’s intent to liberally construe the broad powers provided to those municipalities that adopt Home Rule? More specifically, whether the Commonwealth Court erred in affirming the trial court’s ruling that “The Protection of Displaced Contract Workers Ordinance,” Pittsburgh City Code of Ordinances 22-2004, Chapter 769, Janitorial, Building Maintenance and Security Contractors (“PDCWO”) is ultra vires pursuant to 53 Pa.C.S. § 2962(f)?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW this 24th day of September, 2008, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby GRANTED. The issue, as stated by Petitioners, is:

Whether the Commonwealth Court’s opinion conflicts with the Home Rule law’s intent to liberally construe the broad powers provided to those municipalities that adopt Home Rule? More specifically, whether the Commonwealth Court erred in affirming the trial court’s ruling that “The Protection of Displaced Contract Workers Ordinance,” Pittsburgh City Code of Ordinances 22-2004, Chapter 769, Janitorial, Building Maintenance and Security Contractors (“PDCWO”) is ultra vires pursuant to 53 Pa.C.S. § 2962(f)?

Building Owners & Managers Ass'n v. City of Pittsburgh, 957 A.2d 228, 598 Pa. 382, 2008 Pa. LEXIS 1570 (Pa. 2008).

Pincite

957 A.2d 228 (Building Owners & Managers Ass'n v. City of Pittsburgh) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related