BUILDING OWNERS AND MANAGERS ASSOCIATION OF PITTSBURGH v. City of Pittsburgh
957 A.2d 228
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedSeptember 24, 2008
Docket353 WAL 2007, 354 WAL 2007
StatusPublished
This text of 957 A.2d 228 (BUILDING OWNERS AND MANAGERS ASSOCIATION OF PITTSBURGH v. City of Pittsburgh) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
BUILDING OWNERS AND MANAGERS ASSOCIATION OF PITTSBURGH v. City of Pittsburgh, 957 A.2d 228 (Pa. 2008).
Opinion
*229 ORDER
AND NOW this 24th day of September, 2008, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby GRANTED. The issue, as stated by Petitioners, is:
Whether the Commonwealth Court’s opinion conflicts with the Home Rule law’s intent to liberally construe the broad powers provided to those municipalities that adopt Home Rule? More specifically, whether the Commonwealth Court erred in affirming the trial court’s ruling that “The Protection of Displaced Contract Workers Ordinance,” Pittsburgh City Code of Ordinances 22-2004, Chapter 769, Janitorial, Building Maintenance and Security Contractors (“PDCWO”) is ultra vires pursuant to 53 Pa.C.S. § 2962(f)?
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
§ 2962
Pennsylvania § 2962(f)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
957 A.2d 228, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/building-owners-and-managers-association-of-pittsburgh-v-city-of-pa-2008.