Building Inspector of Holden v. Johnstone

258 N.E.2d 72, 357 Mass. 768
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided April 2, 1970·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

The building inspector appeals from a final decree permitting the defendant to keep on his premises as he had “for several years” one pony for his own use which the judge found was not commercial. The premises are in a “single-family . . . district.” The judge found that the area “is still a rural area,” that there was no evidence of nuisance, that the keeping of one pony would not substantially derogate from the spirit and purpose of the by-law or be detrimental to the public good. The section of the by-law relied upon by the plaintiff affords no guide in the circumstances. The holding in Pratt v. Building Inspector of Gloucester, 330 Mass. 344, 346-347, is not applicable.

Decree affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Building Inspector of Holden v. Johnstone, 258 N.E.2d 72, 357 Mass. 768 (Mass. 1970).

258 N.E.2d 72 (Building Inspector of Holden v. Johnstone) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Simmons v. Zoning Board of Appeals
798 N.E.2d 1025 (Massachusetts Appeals Court, 2003)
Sacco v. Inspector of Buildings
327 N.E.2d 924 (Massachusetts Appeals Court, 1975)