Building Commissioner v. Santilli

358 Mass. 816
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided January 29, 1971·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The plaintiff appeals from a final decree dismissing a bill in equity to restrain the defendants from conducting the business of an automobile body repair shop on their premises. The evidence is reported, but there are no findings. There was no evidence of the provisions of the Boston Zoning Code, of what uses of the premises are permitted by that Code, of the legal occupancy, or of a change of occupancy of the premises. We do not take judicial notice of regulations promulgated by city agencies. Commonwealth v. Berney, 353 Mass. 571, 572. Commonwealth v. Minicost Car Rental, Inc. 354 Mass. 746, 747. In the absence of evidence of the violation alleged, there was no error in dismissing the bill.

Decree affirmed with costs of appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Building Commissioner v. Santilli, 358 Mass. 816 (Mass. 1971).

358 Mass. 816 (Building Commissioner v. Santilli) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Teixeira v. Cab Three, Inc.
1994 Mass. App. Div. 154 (Mass. Dist. Ct., App. Div., 1994)