BUILDER'S TRANSPORT, INC. v. Wilson

914 S.W.2d 742, 323 Ark. 327, 48 A.L.R. 5th 797, 1996 Ark. LEXIS 81
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas
DecidedFebruary 12, 1996
Docket95-899
StatusPublished
Cited by16 cases

This text of 914 S.W.2d 742 (BUILDER'S TRANSPORT, INC. v. Wilson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
BUILDER'S TRANSPORT, INC. v. Wilson, 914 S.W.2d 742, 323 Ark. 327, 48 A.L.R. 5th 797, 1996 Ark. LEXIS 81 (Ark. 1996).

Opinion

Robert H. Dudley, Justice.

Lincoln Wilson was injured when his car was struck by a tractor-trailer owned by Builders Transport, Inc., and driven by Robert Claussen. Wilson filed suit against Builders and Claussen, and the jury returned a verdict of $245,000. Judgment was entered for the amount of the verdict. Builders and Claussen appeal and contend that the award is excessive. We affirm the judgment.

When an award of damages is alleged on appeal to be excessive, the appellate court reviews the proof and all reasonable inferences most favorably to the appellee and determines whether the verdict is so great as to shock the appellate court’s conscience or demonstrate passion or prejudice on the part of the trier of fact. Warhurst v. White, 310 Ark. 546, 838 S.W.2d 350 (1992). In determining whether the amount of damages is so great as to shock the conscience, the appellate court considers such elements as past and future medical expenses, permanent injury, loss of earning capacity, scars resulting in disfigurement, and pain, suffering, and mental anguish. Wheeler v. Bennett, 312 Ark. 411, 422, 849 S.W.2d 952, 958 (1993). The determination is made on a case-by-case basis as “precedents are of scant value in appeals of this kind.” Matthews v. Rodgers, 279 Ark. 328, 335, 651 S.W.2d 453, 457 (1983) (citation omitted); Mustang Elect. Servs. v. Nipper, 272 Ark. 263, 613 S.W.2d 397 (1981). “A jury has much discretion in awarding damages in personal injury cases.” Bill Davis Trucking, Inc. v. Prysock, 301 Ark. 387, 391, 784 S.W.2d 755, 757 (1990) (citations omitted).

In the case at bar, Wilson suffered injuries to his back and neck, a torn rotator cuff in his left shoulder, and cuts and bruises to his face, head, right shoulder, arms, and legs. In the months following the accident, he was treated for continued and increasing pain and tenderness in his left shoulder by Dr. Mark Jansen, a general practioner. Dr. Jansen subsequently recommended that Wilson go to an orthopedic surgeon for further observation. He did so, and magnetic resonance imaging revealed that his left rotator cuff was torn.

Dr. Scott Bowen, an orthopedic surgeon, performed surgery to repair the torn rotator cuff. Dr. Bowen described the surgery as requiring a three-to-four-inch incision into the front of the shoulder. This procedure splits the muscle to reveal the underlying deeper tissues. Dr. Bowen testified:

[T]he bursal covering is opened and the tendon is then seen. And it is a deep structure, and it was torn and retracted. It required a fair amount of mobilization of the tissues and advancing the tissues down, forming a little bony trough and bringing structures out through the bone, so it’s a fairly extensive procedure.

Dr. Bowen described appellee’s tear as being “quite large” and “a broad, retracted tear.” He testified that “the tissue was actually pulled away” and required “immobilizing or exposing more of this tissue and moving it to advance it out to where it can be repaired.” He testified that following this type of surgery, the arm is placed in a pillow-type splint for approximately three weeks. The patient then undergoes therapy that progresses through three months following surgery.

Dr. Bowen testified that Wilson will have some permanent loss of normal function. He rated the impairment to Wilson’s left arm at eight percent (8%), which translates into a five percent (5%) impairment to the body as a whole. He testified that Wilson might need medication or injections in the future to control pain and problems with his left shoulder. He testified that, on rare occasions, an individual suffers a re-tear and will require a second surgery. Finally, he expressed the opinion, within a reasonable degree of medical certainty, that Wilson’s torn rotator cuff was caused by the collision.

Approximately eight months after the surgery, Wilson returned to Dr. Jansen and stated that he had continued pain in his left shoulder. A clinical test performed at that time indicated that the rotator cuff was torn. Dr. Jansen recommended continued medication, rest, and modification of activities.

Wilson had contracted polio as an infant. Throughout his life, the disabilities resulting from polio had affected the use of both of his feet and his right arm. As a result, he relied heavily on his left arm in going about his daily activities. He used his left arm to get out of chairs and to pull himself up stairways. He testified that his left arm was his life.

Testimony established that Wilson had been self-sufficient before the accident. He lived alone, drove a car, did his own housework, worked in his yard, and enjoyed various other activities, including singing at senior adult dances. He was fifty-seven years old at the time of. the accident.

After the accident, Wilson suffered increasing pain and inability to use his left arm, the arm on which he relied. Following the surgery to repair the torn rotator cuff, he remained in the hospital for three days. While in the hospital, he was unable to take care of his personal needs such as bathing and eating. His sister and nurses bathed and fed him. Upon returning home, he was unable to take care of his bodily functions, such as cleaning himself after bowel movements, and was concerned about the way he smelled. For six weeks following the surgery, Wilson had to ask people to run errands for him, and a home-health service bathed him, took his temperature and blood pressure, and changed his bandages.

Wilson’s neck and back continue to hurt. He has painful “shoulder pops” on a daily basis. He now has difficulty getting out of chairs and climbing stairs. He has difficulty eating.

Before the accident, Wilson used hand tools and worked around his home. He cleaned his house. He is no longer able to do these things. He hired an individual to do his outdoor housework at a cost of $115. He pays thirty dollars a month to have his house cleaned.

He now has a fear of driving. He does not participate in activities as he did before the accident. He is afraid he will be required to go into a nursing home at an early age as a result of the injury to his left arm. He continues to suffer pain in his neck, shoulder, and back, and is unable to properly use his left arm.

There was evidence that Wilson will need future medication and injections and possibly physical therapy. In addition, Wilson presented evidence that his rotator cuff was not intact eight months after the repair surgery. He did not establish a sum certain for future costs. However, “[f]uture medical expenses do not require the same degree of certainty as past medical expenses.” Matthews v. Rodgers, 279 Ark. 328, 335, 651 S.W.2d 453, 457 (1983).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Velosky v. United States
W.D. Arkansas, 2022
Miguel Escobar v. A&A Orchard, LLC
2021 Ark. App. 128 (Court of Appeals of Arkansas, 2021)
Vaccaro Lumber v. Fesperman
267 S.W.3d 619 (Court of Appeals of Arkansas, 2007)
Stewart Title Guaranty Co. v. American Abstract & Title Co.
215 S.W.3d 596 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 2005)
Northport Health Services, Inc. v. Owens
158 S.W.3d 164 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 2004)
Bank of Eureka Springs v. Evans
109 S.W.3d 672 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 2003)
Fayetteville Diagnostic Clinic, Ltd. v. Turner
42 S.W.3d 420 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 2001)
Ellis v. Price
990 S.W.2d 543 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1999)
Pearson v. Henrickson
983 S.W.2d 419 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1999)
United Insurance Co. of America v. Murphy
961 S.W.2d 752 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1998)
Smith v. Galaz
953 S.W.2d 576 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1997)
Collins v. Hinton
937 S.W.2d 164 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
914 S.W.2d 742, 323 Ark. 327, 48 A.L.R. 5th 797, 1996 Ark. LEXIS 81, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/builders-transport-inc-v-wilson-ark-1996.