Builders' Council of Suburban New York, Inc. v. City of Yonkers

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Builders' Council of Suburban New York, Inc. v. City of Yonkers

79 A.D.2d 696, 434 N.Y.S.2d 450, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14083

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 29, 1980·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

In an action for a declaratory judgment, defendants appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated February 2, 1979, which, upon granting plaintiffs’ cross motion for summary judgment, declared Local Law No. 3 of the Local Laws of 1978 of the City of Yonkers to be unconstitutional, illegal and void. We deem defendants’ notice of appeal to be a premature notice from the judgment (CPLR 5520, subd [e]). Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements. Local Law No. 3 and RPAPL article 7-A are directed at the same subject matter and are inconsistent. Thus, Local Law No. 3 is pre-empted by article 7-A (see NY Const, art IX, § 2, subd [c] ; Municipal Home Rule Law, § 10, subd 1, par [i]). Moreover, the local law denies multiple dwelling owners their right to procedural due process. It is replete with various improper and illegal provisions. Thus, Special Term correctly declared the law to be unconstitutional, illegal and void. Titone, J. P., Mangano, Gibbons and Weinstein, JJ., concur. [106 Misc 2d 700.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action for a declaratory judgment, defendants appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated February 2, 1979, which, upon granting plaintiffs’ cross motion for summary judgment, declared Local Law No. 3 of the Local Laws of 1978 of the City of Yonkers to be unconstitutional, illegal and void. We deem defendants’ notice of appeal to be a premature notice from the judgment (CPLR 5520, subd [e]). Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements. Local Law No. 3 and RPAPL article 7-A are directed at the same subject matter and are inconsistent. Thus, Local Law No. 3 is pre-empted by article 7-A (see NY Const, art IX, § 2, subd [c] ; Municipal Home Rule Law, § 10, subd 1, par [i]). Moreover, the local law denies multiple dwelling owners their right to procedural due process. It is replete with various improper and illegal provisions. Thus, Special Term correctly declared the law to be unconstitutional, illegal and void. Titone, J. P., Mangano, Gibbons and Weinstein, JJ., concur. [106 Misc 2d 700.]

Builders' Council of Suburban New York, Inc. v. City of Yonkers, 79 A.D.2d 696, 434 N.Y.S.2d 450, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14083 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1980).

Pincite

79 A.D.2d 696 (Builders' Council of Suburban New York, Inc. v. City of Yonkers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related