Buie v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.

Texas Supreme Court

Buie v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.

63 S.W. 627, 94 Tex. 566, 1901 Tex. LEXIS 195

CourtTexas Supreme Court

DecidedJune 17, 1901

DocketNo. 1022.

StatusPublished

This text of 63 S.W. 627 (Buie v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Buie v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co., 63 S.W. 627, 94 Tex. 566, 1901 Tex. LEXIS 195 (Tex. 1901).

Pincite

Opinion

GAINES, Chief Justice.

This is a certified question. The statement, instead of setting out the facts upon which the question is *567 predicated, refers to the statements in the appellant’s brief under the assignment which presents the question as “supplemented by a statement in the brief” of the appellee. The statement in appellant’s brief embraces nineteen pages of printed matter and that in the brief of appellee approximately twelve. We think that in enacting the statute which authorized a Court of Civil Appeals to certify to this court a question for determination, it was contemplated that the Court of Civil Appeals should embody in the certificate itself a statement of - the facts upon which the question arose, and that it was not contemplated that the certificate should merely refer to the briefs for such statement. The practice inaugurated by the certificate in this case is, as we think, not only not productive of any good result, but is calculated to lead to confusion, and is therefore fraught with evil. We are unwilling to sanction the practice in this case and thereby to set a precedent.

With due deference to the learned court who have certified the question, we think the certificate should be dismissed, and it is therefore so ordered.

Certificate dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

GAINES, Chief Justice.

This is a certified question. The statement, instead of setting out the facts upon which the question is *567 predicated, refers to the statements in the appellant’s brief under the assignment which presents the question as “supplemented by a statement in the brief” of the appellee. The statement in appellant’s brief embraces nineteen pages of printed matter and that in the brief of appellee approximately twelve. We think that in enacting the statute which authorized a Court of Civil Appeals to certify to this court a question for determination, it was contemplated that the Court of Civil Appeals should embody in the certificate itself a statement of - the facts upon which the question arose, and that it was not contemplated that the certificate should merely refer to the briefs for such statement. The practice inaugurated by the certificate in this case is, as we think, not only not productive of any good result, but is calculated to lead to confusion, and is therefore fraught with evil. We are unwilling to sanction the practice in this case and thereby to set a precedent.

With due deference to the learned court who have certified the question, we think the certificate should be dismissed, and it is therefore so ordered.

Certificate dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

63 S.W. 627, 94 Tex. 566, 1901 Tex. LEXIS 195, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/buie-v-chicago-rock-island-pacific-railway-co-tex-1901.