Buie v. Blum
78 A.D.2d 775, 435 N.Y.S.2d 550, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13337
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 30, 1980·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: Because the facts are fully revealed and undisputed in light of Baker v Sterling (39 NY2d 397, 405-406) it would be useless for petitioner to make the application which respondents would require. (Appeals from judgment of Monroe Supreme Court — art 78.) Present — Cardamone, J. P., Simons, Hancock, Jr., Callahan and Witmer, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Buie v. Blum, 78 A.D.2d 775, 435 N.Y.S.2d 550, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13337 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1980).
78 A.D.2d 775 (Buie v. Blum) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Arkansas Department of Human Services v. Donis
655 S.W.2d 452 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1983)