Buie v. Bertha Mineral Co.

118 S.E. 75, 30 Ga. App. 369, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 471
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJune 12, 1923
Docket14543
StatusPublished

This text of 118 S.E. 75 (Buie v. Bertha Mineral Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Buie v. Bertha Mineral Co., 118 S.E. 75, 30 Ga. App. 369, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 471 (Ga. Ct. App. 1923).

Opinion

Luke, J.

1. This ease has been in this court heretofore (Bertha Mineral Co. v. Buie, 27 Ga. App. 660, 109 S. E. 539), and the rulings then announced are the law of the case. Under the evidence, the court properly directed a verdict in favor of the plaintiff in fi. fa., and did not err in thereafter overruling the motion for a new trial, which was based upon the general grounds and upon the court’s direction of a verdict.

2. It not affirmatively appearing to this court that the bill of exceptions was sued out for the purpose of delay only, the request of the defendant in error that it be awarded damages is denied.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bertha Mineral Co. v. Buie
109 S.E. 539 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1921)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
118 S.E. 75, 30 Ga. App. 369, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 471, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/buie-v-bertha-mineral-co-gactapp-1923.