Buhl (Eric) v. State

CourtNevada Supreme Court
DecidedApril 30, 2019
Docket75441
StatusUnpublished

This text of Buhl (Eric) v. State (Buhl (Eric) v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Buhl (Eric) v. State, (Neb. 2019).

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

ERIC ANTHONY BUHL, No. 75441 Appellant, vs. THE STATE OF NEVADA, FILED Respondent. APR 3 0 2019 EUZABEIR A. BROWN ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE SUPREME COURT BY 4 EP njAZ DUTY Ol Eric Buhl appeals from the judgment of conviction following his guilty plea to first-degree murder. First Judicial District Court, Carson City; James E. Wilson, Judge. Buhl was sentenced to life with the possibility of parole after 20 years under NRS 200.030(4)(b)(2), but argues that, given his traumatic childhood, the district court should have sentenced him to a definite term of 20 to 50 years. We affirm. "[Vile afford the district court wide discretion in its sentencing decision." Allred v. State, 120 Nev. 410, 420, 92 P.3d 1246, 1253 (2004), limited on other grounds by Knipes v. State, 124 Nev. 927, 192 P.3d 1178 (2008). Buhl urges us to reconsider that deference, see, e.g., Sims v. State, 107 Nev. 438, 442, 814 P.2d 63, 65 (1991) (Rose, J., dissenting) (expressing concern that "the part of the criminal process that has the greatest ultimate effect on the defendant—the imposition of his or her sentence—is the part we decline to review"), but this would violate stare decisis and is unwarranted in this case. The sentence the district court imposed was within the range authorized by law. In imposing it, the district court considered Buhl's age, lack of criminal history, choice to plead guilty, and his "terribly traumatic SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) 194Th 19-1$823 childhood." We find no abuse of discretion in the district court's decision to sentence Buhl to life in prison with the possibility of parole after 20 years, rather than a definite term of 20 to 50 years, for beating a child to death. See id. at 440, 814 P.2d at 64 (majority op.) (upholding a district court's sentence within the statutory guidelines because it is not the "proper role of this court to be that of an appellate sentencing body"). Accordingly, we ORDER the judgment of conviction AFFIRMED.

J. Pickering

Co---LA ,

Parraguirre

J.

cc: Hon. James E. Wilson, District Judge State Public Defender/Carson City Carson City District Attorney Carson City Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 (0) 1947.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sims v. State
814 P.2d 63 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1991)
Allred v. State
92 P.3d 1246 (Nevada Supreme Court, 2004)
Knipes v. State
192 P.3d 1178 (Nevada Supreme Court, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Buhl (Eric) v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/buhl-eric-v-state-nev-2019.