Buglione v. Buglione
279 A.D. 1089, 112 N.Y.S.2d 793, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5941
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 19, 1952·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
The issues should not have been determined on affidavits, especially where, as here, a demand for a hearing was made. Recourse should be had to the usual practice of seeing and hearing the witnesses who may be produced, with opportunity for cross-examination. (See Josephson v. Josephson, 276 App. Div. 845, and eases cited.) Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Wenzel, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Buglione v. Buglione, 279 A.D. 1089, 112 N.Y.S.2d 793, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5941 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1952).
279 A.D. 1089 (Buglione v. Buglione) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Guedes v. Guedes
45 A.D.3d 533 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
Kleila v. Miller
1 A.D.2d 697 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1955)