Buglione v. Buglione
This text of 279 A.D. 1089 (Buglione v. Buglione) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The issues should not have been determined on affidavits, especially where, as here, a demand for a hearing was made. Recourse should be had to the usual practice of seeing and hearing the witnesses who may be produced, with opportunity for cross-examination. (See Josephson v. Josephson, 276 App. Div. 845, and eases cited.) Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Wenzel, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
279 A.D. 1089, 112 N.Y.S.2d 793, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5941, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/buglione-v-buglione-nyappdiv-1952.