Bugle v. Myers

59 Ind. 73
Indiana Supreme Court·Decided November 15, 1877·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinions

Perkins, J.

— Replevin before a justice, for a picture, of the value of twenty-five dollars. The picture was taken by the officer and delivered to the plaintiff.

Judgment for the plaintiff’ before the justice, and in the circuit court, on appeal.

On appeal to this court, but one error is assigned, viz.: that the circuit court erred in overruling the motion there made in arrest of judgment; and the only ground presented in the brief of counsel, on which it is claimed that that motion should have prevailed, is, that the bond given on the commencement of the replevin suit is insufficient. This defect, if it exists, is not reached by motion in arrest of judgment.

No error is assigned, as has been intimated, on any other ruling of the court, and the motion in arrest did not reach error in other rulings made in this case.

The judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bugle v. Myers, 59 Ind. 73 (Ind. 1877).

59 Ind. 73 (Bugle v. Myers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Allen v. Frederick
59 N.E. 330 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1901)
Opp v. TenEyck
99 Ind. 345 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1884)
Fawkner v. Baden
89 Ind. 587 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1883)
Carver v. Carver
77 Ind. 498 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1881)
Miller v. O'Reilly
84 Ind. 168 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1881)
Vincennes National Bank v. Cockrum
64 Ind. 229 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1878)