Bugger v. Cresswell
12 A. 829, 8 Sadler 555, 4 Montg. 47, 1888 Pa. LEXIS 841
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedMarch 5, 1888
DocketNo. 331, E. D.
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases
This text of 12 A. 829 (Bugger v. Cresswell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Bugger v. Cresswell, 12 A. 829, 8 Sadler 555, 4 Montg. 47, 1888 Pa. LEXIS 841 (Pa. 1888).
Opinion
The attempted reformation of the contract of the 14th of September, 1883, was a signal failure. Where there is oath against oath, as in this case, a chancellor invariably refuses to interfere. Independently of this, the circumstances of the transaction are all opposed to the theory of the plaintiff.
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Commonwealth v. Olloman
23 Pa. D. & C. 125 (Washington County Court of Common Pleas, 1934)
Harper v. Pierce
1913 OK 329 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1913)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
12 A. 829, 8 Sadler 555, 4 Montg. 47, 1888 Pa. LEXIS 841, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bugger-v-cresswell-pa-1888.