Bugge v. Pring

257 P. 629, 144 Wash. 698, 1927 Wash. LEXIS 740
Washington Supreme Court·Decided June 27, 1927·No. No. 20542. Department One.·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This action was brought to recover a broker’s commission and grows out of the same transaction as does the case Fallers v. Pring, ante, p. 224, 257 Pac. 627, just decided. The trial court sustained the claimed right to recover the commission, and the defendant appeals.

The court having reached the conclusion in the other case that the contract should he specifically enforced, this controls the right of the respondent in the present case to a brokerage commission, about the amount of which there is no controversy.

The judgment will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bugge v. Pring, 257 P. 629, 144 Wash. 698, 1927 Wash. LEXIS 740 (Wash. 1927).

257 P. 629 (Bugge v. Pring) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fallers v. Pring
257 P. 627 (Washington Supreme Court, 1927)