Bugge v. Pring

Washington Supreme Court

Bugge v. Pring

257 P. 629, 144 Wash. 698, 1927 Wash. LEXIS 740

CourtWashington Supreme Court

DecidedJune 27, 1927

DocketNo. 20542. Department One.

StatusPublished

This text of 257 P. 629 (Bugge v. Pring) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bugge v. Pring, 257 P. 629, 144 Wash. 698, 1927 Wash. LEXIS 740 (Wash. 1927).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This action was brought to recover a broker’s commission and grows out of the same transaction as does the case Fallers v. Pring, ante, p. 224, 257 Pac. 627, just decided. The trial court sustained the claimed right to recover the commission, and the defendant appeals.

The court having reached the conclusion in the other case that the contract should he specifically enforced, this controls the right of the respondent in the present case to a brokerage commission, about the amount of which there is no controversy.

The judgment will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This action was brought to recover a broker’s commission and grows out of the same transaction as does the case Fallers v. Pring, ante, p. 224, 257 Pac. 627, just decided. The trial court sustained the claimed right to recover the commission, and the defendant appeals.

The court having reached the conclusion in the other case that the contract should he specifically enforced, this controls the right of the respondent in the present case to a brokerage commission, about the amount of which there is no controversy.

The judgment will be affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

257 P. 629, 144 Wash. 698, 1927 Wash. LEXIS 740, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bugge-v-pring-wash-1927.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack