Bugg v. Schmidt

Missouri Court of Appeals

Bugg v. Schmidt

340 S.W.3d 197, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 322, 2011 WL 865261

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 15, 2011

DocketWD 72665

StatusPublished

This text of 340 S.W.3d 197 (Bugg v. Schmidt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bugg v. Schmidt, 340 S.W.3d 197, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 322, 2011 WL 865261 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Eldon Bugg filed suit against Kevin Schmidt alleging claims sounding in fraud as it pertained to a skid loader that Schmidt sold to Eldon Bugg’s brother, Billy Bugg. Billy Bugg assigned his claims to Eldon Bugg. After Schmidt moved to dismiss these claims, the trial court granted the motion to dismiss.

We affirm. Rule 84.16(b). A memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order has been provided to the parties.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Eldon Bugg filed suit against Kevin Schmidt alleging claims sounding in fraud as it pertained to a skid loader that Schmidt sold to Eldon Bugg’s brother, Billy Bugg. Billy Bugg assigned his claims to Eldon Bugg. After Schmidt moved to dismiss these claims, the trial court granted the motion to dismiss.

We affirm. Rule 84.16(b). A memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order has been provided to the parties.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

340 S.W.3d 197, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 322, 2011 WL 865261, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bugg-v-schmidt-moctapp-2011.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack