Buford W. Collins v. Allied Signal, Inc.

889 F.2d 1084, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 16260, 52 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1472, 1989 WL 134605
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedOctober 27, 1989
Docket89-2391
StatusUnpublished

This text of 889 F.2d 1084 (Buford W. Collins v. Allied Signal, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Buford W. Collins v. Allied Signal, Inc., 889 F.2d 1084, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 16260, 52 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1472, 1989 WL 134605 (4th Cir. 1989).

Opinion

889 F.2d 1084

52 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. 1472

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Buford W. COLLINS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
ALLIED SIGNAL, INC., Defendant-Appellee.

No. 89-2391.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Sept. 5, 1989.
Decided Oct. 27, 1989.

Robert P. Geary on brief for appellant.

Hill B. Wellford, Jr., Donald L. Creach, Hunton & Williams, on brief for appellee.

Before K.K. HALL and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Buford W. Collins appeals from the district court's order granting summary judgment in favor of the defendant, Allied Signal, Inc., in this age discrimination case brought pursuant to the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. Secs. 621, et seq. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Collins v. Allied Signal, Inc., C/A No. 88-0866-R (E.D.Va. Apr. 25, 1989). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Miller (Nancy L.) v. Aluminum Company of America
856 F.2d 184 (Third Circuit, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
889 F.2d 1084, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 16260, 52 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1472, 1989 WL 134605, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/buford-w-collins-v-allied-signal-inc-ca4-1989.