Buford v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Buford v. State

497 S.W.3d 872, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 869, 2016 WL 4598530

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedSeptember 6, 2016

DocketNo. ED 103168

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 497 S.W.3d 872 (Buford v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Buford v. State, 497 S.W.3d 872, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 869, 2016 WL 4598530 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Sean K. Buford appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We find that the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Sean K. Buford appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We find that the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

497 S.W.3d 872, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 869, 2016 WL 4598530, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/buford-v-state-moctapp-2016.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack