Buford v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Buford v. State

376 So. 2d 479, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 16073

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedNovember 9, 1979

DocketNo. MM-347

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 376 So. 2d 479 (Buford v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Buford v. State, 376 So. 2d 479, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 16073 (Fla. Ct. App. 1979).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We have considered this appeal from a judgment of guilt and an order placing appellant on probation pursuant to the dictates of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). After a review of the record, we have determined that condition (12) of the probation order requiring that appellant make restitution to the victim in an unspecified amount is improper and the same is hereby stricken. The conviction is affirmed but the cause is remanded to the trial court for a determination of the amount of restitution to be made after providing appellant notice and an opportunity to be heard. McClure v. State, 371 So.2d 196 (Fla.2d DCA 1979); Fresneda v. State, 347 So.2d 1021 (Fla. 1977).

ROBERT P. SMITH, Jr., Acting C. J., and ERVIN and BOOTH, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We have considered this appeal from a judgment of guilt and an order placing appellant on probation pursuant to the dictates of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). After a review of the record, we have determined that condition (12) of the probation order requiring that appellant make restitution to the victim in an unspecified amount is improper and the same is hereby stricken. The conviction is affirmed but the cause is remanded to the trial court for a determination of the amount of restitution to be made after providing appellant notice and an opportunity to be heard. McClure v. State, 371 So.2d 196 (Fla.2d DCA 1979); Fresneda v. State, 347 So.2d 1021 (Fla. 1977).

ROBERT P. SMITH, Jr., Acting C. J., and ERVIN and BOOTH, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

376 So. 2d 479, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 16073, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/buford-v-state-fladistctapp-1979.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack