Buford v. M'Daniel

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Buford v. M'Daniel

8 Ky. 426

DecidedApril 7, 1819

StatusPublished

This text of 8 Ky. 426 (Buford v. M'Daniel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Buford v. M'Daniel, 8 Ky. 426 (Ky. Ct. App. 1819).

Pincite

Opinion

Judge Owsley

delivered the opinion of the court.

The action in this ease being joint, and founded upon 3 joint undertaking, it'was dearly irregular, after the service of process upon Buford and Pawling, and without the cause having been disposed of as to Pawling, to take judgment 'against Buford only.

The judgment must therefore be reversed with cost, the cause remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judge Owsley

delivered the opinion of the court.

The action in this ease being joint, and founded upon 3 joint undertaking, it'was dearly irregular, after the service of process upon Buford and Pawling, and without the cause having been disposed of as to Pawling, to take judgment 'against Buford only.

The judgment must therefore be reversed with cost, the cause remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

8 Ky. 426, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/buford-v-mdaniel-kyctapp-1819.