Buford Randle A/K/A Randle Buford v. State
This text of Buford Randle A/K/A Randle Buford v. State (Buford Randle A/K/A Randle Buford v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-14-00741-CR
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________
BUFORD RANDLE A/K/A RANDLE BUFORD, Appellant,
v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee. ____________________________________________________________
On appeal from the 148th District Court of Nueces County, Texas. ____________________________________________________________
ORDER OF ABATEMENT
Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Garza Order Per Curiam Appellant, Buford Randle a/k/a Randle Buford, has filed a notice of appeal with this
Court from his conviction in trial court cause number 12-CR-2890-E. The trial court has
certified that this “is a plea-bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal,” and
“the defendant has waived the right of appeal.” See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). On December 19, 2014, we ordered appellant's counsel, John M. Lamerson, to,
within thirty days, review the record and advise this Court as to whether appellant has a
right to appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 44.3, 44.4. Counsel responded to this Court's order
stating the appellant retained his right to appeal those matters raised by pretrial motion
and ruled upon by the trial court. Counsel advises this Court that no amended
certification has been filed.
Therefore, we ABATE this appeal and REMAND this cause to the trial court for a
hearing to determine whether the appellant has the right of appeal. We further direct the
trial court to issue findings of fact and conclusions of law regarding this issue. The trial
court's amended certification, and any orders it enters shall be included in a supplemental
clerk's record. The trial court is directed to cause the supplemental clerk's record to be
filed with the Clerk of this Court within thirty days from the date of this order. Should the
trial court require more time to comply with the directions of this Court, it shall request an
extension prior to the expiration of this deadline.
It is so ORDERED.
PER CURIAM
Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
Delivered and filed the 12th day of February, 2015.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Buford Randle A/K/A Randle Buford v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/buford-randle-aka-randle-buford-v-state-texapp-2015.