Bufogle v. Ernst

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Bufogle v. Ernst

199 A.D.2d 455, 608 N.Y.S.2d 106

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 27, 1993

StatusPublished

This text of 199 A.D.2d 455 (Bufogle v. Ernst) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bufogle v. Ernst, 199 A.D.2d 455, 608 N.Y.S.2d 106 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

In a medical malpractice action, the defendant Anthony Joseph Pesiri appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Durante, J.), dated April 30, 1991, as denied his motion for summary judgment.

Ordered that the order is afiirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements, for the reasons stated by Justice Durante at the Supreme Court. Mangano, P. J., Rosenblatt, Lawrence, Copertino and Joy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a medical malpractice action, the defendant Anthony Joseph Pesiri appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Durante, J.), dated April 30, 1991, as denied his motion for summary judgment.

Ordered that the order is afiirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements, for the reasons stated by Justice Durante at the Supreme Court. Mangano, P. J., Rosenblatt, Lawrence, Copertino and Joy, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

199 A.D.2d 455, 608 N.Y.S.2d 106, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bufogle-v-ernst-nyappdiv-1993.