Buffolino v. City of New York
This text of 92 A.D.3d 633 (Buffolino v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The Supreme Court properly denied, as untimely, the summary judgment motion of the defendant Stephanie Cho, which was made returnable six days beyond the deadline fixed by the Supreme Court in a so-ordered stipulation dated November 30, 2010, as she failed to demonstrate good cause for the delay (see CPLR 2004, 3212 [a]; Brill v City of New York, 2 NY3d 648, 652 [2004]; Van Dyke v Skanska USA Civ. Northeast, Inc., 83 AD3d 1049 [2011]).
In light of the foregoing, we need not reach the parties’ [634]*634remaining contentions. Florio, J.E, Chambers, Hall and Miller, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
92 A.D.3d 633, 937 N.Y.2d 871, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/buffolino-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-2012.