Buffington v. Warden

92 A.2d 450, 201 Md. 642
CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland
DecidedOctober 9, 2001
Docket[H.C. No. 9, October Term, 1952.]
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 92 A.2d 450 (Buffington v. Warden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Buffington v. Warden, 92 A.2d 450, 201 Md. 642 (Md. 2001).

Opinion

201 Md. 642 (1952)
92 A.2d 450

BUFFINGTON
v.
WARDEN OF MARYLAND HOUSE OF CORRECTION

[H.C. No. 9, October Term, 1952.]

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Decided November 11, 1952.

Before MARKELL, C.J., and DELAPLAINE, COLLINS and HENDERSON, JJ.

MARKELL, C.J., delivered the opinion of the Court.

This is an application for leave to appeal from denial of a writ of habeas corpus. Petitioner is imprisoned under sentence for three years on conviction of larceny. Petitioner expresses a desire to offer evidence of an alibi and other proof of his innocence. Apparently he was represented at the trial by counsel of his own selection. Habeas corpus cannot be made to serve the purpose of an appeal or a new trial of the question of guilt or innocence.

Application denied, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sykes v. Warden of Maryland Penitentiary
93 A.2d 549 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 2001)
Ricail v. Warden of Maryland House of Correction
123 A.2d 908 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
92 A.2d 450, 201 Md. 642, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/buffington-v-warden-md-2001.