Buffi v. Ferri

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Buffi v. Ferri

106 R.I. 835

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Buffi v. Ferri. Read the opinion of the Court — 106 R.I. 349 →

Supreme Court of Rhode Island·Decided February 12, 1970·No. M. P. No. 628·Published

Opinion

Motion for leave to reargue denied. Herbert F. DeSimone, Attorney General, Charles G. Edwards, Asst. Attorney General, for Rhode Island Commission for Human Rights. Milton Stanzler, Philip Weinstein, Richard W. Zacks, Amicus Curiae, Rhode Island Affiliate of American Civil Liberties Union; H. Seymour Wiley, Amicus Curiae, Equal Opportunities Group (Chandler W. Johnson, John R. Kellam, Frederick M. Clark, Jr., Rev. E. McKinnon White), for complainant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion for leave to reargue denied. Herbert F. DeSimone, Attorney General, Charles G. Edwards, Asst. Attorney General, for Rhode Island Commission for Human Rights. Milton Stanzler, Philip Weinstein, Richard W. Zacks, Amicus Curiae, Rhode Island Affiliate of American Civil Liberties Union; H. Seymour Wiley, Amicus Curiae, Equal Opportunities Group (Chandler W. Johnson, John R. Kellam, Frederick M. Clark, Jr., Rev. E. McKinnon White), for complainant.

Buffi v. Ferri, 106 R.I. 835 (R.I. 1970).

Pincite

106 R.I. 835 (Buffi v. Ferri) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.