Buffi v. Ferri

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Buffi v. Ferri

106 R.I. 835

CourtSupreme Court of Rhode Island

DecidedFebruary 12, 1970

DocketM. P. No. 628

StatusPublished

This text of 106 R.I. 835 (Buffi v. Ferri) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Buffi v. Ferri, 106 R.I. 835 (R.I. 1970).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion for leave to reargue denied. Herbert F. DeSimone, Attorney General, Charles G. Edwards, Asst. Attorney General, for Rhode Island Commission for Human Rights. Milton Stanzler, Philip Weinstein, Richard W. Zacks, Amicus Curiae, Rhode Island Affiliate of American Civil Liberties Union; H. Seymour Wiley, Amicus Curiae, Equal Opportunities Group (Chandler W. Johnson, John R. Kellam, Frederick M. Clark, Jr., Rev. E. McKinnon White), for complainant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion for leave to reargue denied. Herbert F. DeSimone, Attorney General, Charles G. Edwards, Asst. Attorney General, for Rhode Island Commission for Human Rights. Milton Stanzler, Philip Weinstein, Richard W. Zacks, Amicus Curiae, Rhode Island Affiliate of American Civil Liberties Union; H. Seymour Wiley, Amicus Curiae, Equal Opportunities Group (Chandler W. Johnson, John R. Kellam, Frederick M. Clark, Jr., Rev. E. McKinnon White), for complainant.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

106 R.I. 835, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/buffi-v-ferri-ri-1970.