Buettner v. Superintendent of the Maryland Correctional Institution for Women

212 A.2d 464, 239 Md. 710, 1965 Md. LEXIS 613
CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland
DecidedAugust 5, 1965
Docket[App. No. 106, September Term, 1964.]
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 212 A.2d 464 (Buettner v. Superintendent of the Maryland Correctional Institution for Women) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Buettner v. Superintendent of the Maryland Correctional Institution for Women, 212 A.2d 464, 239 Md. 710, 1965 Md. LEXIS 613 (Md. 1965).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The applicant was convicted in the Criminal Court of Baltimore in 1963 of first degree murder and sentenced to life imprisonment in the Maryland Correctional Institution for Women. She appealed to this Court and we affirmed in Buettner v. State, 233 Md. 235. She then filed a petition for relief *711 under the Uniform Post Conviction Procedure Act, which was denied by Judge Cullen after a hearing.

The applicant has made no attempt whatsoever to comply with Maryland Rule BK46 b, which requires that an application for leave to appeal contain a brief statement of the reasons why the lower court’s order should be reversed or modified. Therefore, the application must be dismissed. Greene v. Warden, 238 Md. 651; Thompson v. Warden, 237 Md. 655; Dofflemyer v. Director, 237 Md. 639.

However, we would have to deny the application even if Rule BK46 b had been complied with since, according to Judge Cullen’s memorandum opinion, the only contention pressed in the hearing below related to certain evidence which was allegedly the product of an illegal search and seizure. This question was decided on the applicant’s direct appeal, Buettner v. State, supra, and therefore could not be raised again in a post conviction proceeding. Code (1964 Cum. Supp.), Art. 27, sec. 645A(a); Bryant v. Warden, 235 Md. 658.

Application denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hiligh v. State
825 A.2d 1108 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 2003)
Hall v. Warden of the Maryland Penitentiary
225 A.2d 273 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1967)
Woodland v. Warden
214 A.2d 160 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1965)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
212 A.2d 464, 239 Md. 710, 1965 Md. LEXIS 613, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/buettner-v-superintendent-of-the-maryland-correctional-institution-for-md-1965.