Buescher v. Ellenberger

Ohio Supreme Court

Buescher v. Ellenberger

34 N.E.2d 777, 138 Ohio St. 332, 138 Ohio St. (N.S.) 332, 20 Ohio Op. 544, 1941 Ohio LEXIS 469

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedMay 7, 1941

Docket28435

StatusPublished

This text of 34 N.E.2d 777 (Buescher v. Ellenberger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Buescher v. Ellenberger, 34 N.E.2d 777, 138 Ohio St. 332, 138 Ohio St. (N.S.) 332, 20 Ohio Op. 544, 1941 Ohio LEXIS 469 (Ohio 1941).

Pincite

Opinion

It appearing that the judges of the court are equally divided in opinion as to the merits of this case (one judge not participating) and are for that reason unable to agree upon a judgment, and the entry of that fact constituting an affirmance of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, it is ordered that said judgment be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Weygandt, C. J., Turner and Zimmerman, JJ., concur. Matthias, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

It appearing that the judges of the court are equally divided in opinion as to the merits of this case (one judge not participating) and are for that reason unable to agree upon a judgment, and the entry of that fact constituting an affirmance of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, it is ordered that said judgment be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Weygandt, C. J., Turner and Zimmerman, JJ., concur. Matthias, J., not participating.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

34 N.E.2d 777, 138 Ohio St. 332, 138 Ohio St. (N.S.) 332, 20 Ohio Op. 544, 1941 Ohio LEXIS 469, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/buescher-v-ellenberger-ohio-1941.