Buenoano v. State
This text of 504 So. 2d 762 (Buenoano v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We granted review of Buenoano v. State, 478 So.2d 387 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985), on the basis of apparent conflict with such opinions as Heiney v. State, 447 So.2d 210 (Fla.), cert, denied, 469 U.S. 920, 105 S.Ct. 303, 83 L.Ed.2d 237 (1984); and McArthur v. State, 351 So.2d 972 (Fla.1977), setting forth the standard of review for the sufficiency of the evidence in criminal cases in which convictions are based upon circumstantial evidence. Upon closer examination of Buenoano, however, we have determined that the district court decision is fully in accord with this line of precedent. Finding no direct and express conflict with any Florida appellate opinion, we note that jurisdiction has been improvidently granted and dismiss the instant petition for review.
It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
504 So. 2d 762, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 177, 1987 Fla. LEXIS 1737, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/buenoano-v-state-fla-1987.