Bueno v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Bueno v. State

837 So. 2d 573, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 1369, 2003 WL 289233

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 12, 2003

DocketNo. 3D02-2953

StatusPublished

This text of 837 So. 2d 573 (Bueno v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bueno v. State, 837 So. 2d 573, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 1369, 2003 WL 289233 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the order denying the appellant’s motion for post-conviction relief where the record conclusively refutes the appellant’s arguments and/or such arguments were waived by virtue of his plea agreement. The state properly concedes, however, that the appellant is entitled to an additional 16 days of jail credits. Accordingly, we affirm the order, but remand for the imposition of 16 additional days of jail credit for the appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the order denying the appellant’s motion for post-conviction relief where the record conclusively refutes the appellant’s arguments and/or such arguments were waived by virtue of his plea agreement. The state properly concedes, however, that the appellant is entitled to an additional 16 days of jail credits. Accordingly, we affirm the order, but remand for the imposition of 16 additional days of jail credit for the appellant.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

837 So. 2d 573, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 1369, 2003 WL 289233, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bueno-v-state-fladistctapp-2003.