Bueno v. Bass Lake Joint Union Elementary School District

E.D. California

Bueno v. Bass Lake Joint Union Elementary School District

DecidedMarch 31, 2025

Docket1:21-cv-00436

StatusUnknown

This text of Bueno v. Bass Lake Joint Union Elementary School District (Bueno v. Bass Lake Joint Union Elementary School District) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bueno v. Bass Lake Joint Union Elementary School District, (E.D. Cal. 2025).

Pincite

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DAISY BUENO, individually and as Case No. 1:21-cv-00436-JLT-HBK guardian ad litem for S.B., a minor, 12 ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION TO Plaintiffs, CONTINUE STAY OF ENTIRE ACTION 13 v. (Doc. No. 77) 14 BASS LAKES SCHOOL DISTRICT, 15 Defendant. 16 17 18 Pending before the Court is the Parties’ joint motion to continue the stay of this action. 19 (Doc. No. 77). On December 17, 2024, the Court granted a stay of this action until March 31, 20 2025 in order that the Parties could participate in and complete mediation. (Doc. No. 75). Due to 21 availability of the mediator and the Parties, mediation is not currently scheduled until April 24, 22 2025. (Doc. No. 77). Thus, the Parties request that the Court continue the stay of this entire 23 action until May 15, 2025. (Id.). 24 The Court finds in its discretion that a continuation of the stay of this action is appropriate. 25 Clinton v. Jones, 520 U.S. 681, 705 (1997). 26 Accordingly, it is ORDERED: 27 1. The Parties’ joint motion to continue the stay of this action (Doc. No. 77) is 28 GRANTED. The Court vacates all previous deadlines (Doc. No. 70), including the 1 pretrial and trial dates (Doc. No. 62) and CONTINUES THE STAY this action until 2 May 15, 2025 or until further order by the Court. 3 2. Within seven (7) days of the mediation’s conclusion, the Parties shall file a “Joint 4 Post Mediation Status Report” regarding the result of the mediation. 5 3. The substance of the mediation is confidential, and no party, lawyer, or other 6 participant may record, or without approval of the Court may disclose any event, 7 including any statement confirming or denying a fact—except settlement—that occurs 8 during the mediation. 9 4. Ifthe Parties reach a settlement at the mediation, a notice of settlement shall promptly 10 be filed with the Court. See Local Rule 160(a). Dispositional documents are due no 11 more than twenty-one (21) days from the filing of the notification, absent good 12 cause. See Local Rule 160(b). 13 5. Ifthe case does not settle, then the Parties shall include in their Joint Post Mediation 14 Status Report proposed deadlines for expert discovery, dispositive motions, pretrial 15 and trial dates. 16 | Dated: _ March 31, 2025 Mihaw. Wh. foareh Zaskth 18 HELENA M. BARCH-KUCHTA 9 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DAISY BUENO, individually and as Case No. 1:21-cv-00436-JLT-HBK guardian ad litem for S.B., a minor, 12 ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION TO Plaintiffs, CONTINUE STAY OF ENTIRE ACTION 13 v. (Doc. No. 77) 14 BASS LAKES SCHOOL DISTRICT, 15 Defendant. 16 17 18 Pending before the Court is the Parties’ joint motion to continue the stay of this action. 19 (Doc. No. 77). On December 17, 2024, the Court granted a stay of this action until March 31, 20 2025 in order that the Parties could participate in and complete mediation. (Doc. No. 75). Due to 21 availability of the mediator and the Parties, mediation is not currently scheduled until April 24, 22 2025. (Doc. No. 77). Thus, the Parties request that the Court continue the stay of this entire 23 action until May 15, 2025. (Id.). 24 The Court finds in its discretion that a continuation of the stay of this action is appropriate. 25 Clinton v. Jones, 520 U.S. 681, 705 (1997). 26 Accordingly, it is ORDERED: 27 1. The Parties’ joint motion to continue the stay of this action (Doc. No. 77) is 28 GRANTED. The Court vacates all previous deadlines (Doc. No. 70), including the 1 pretrial and trial dates (Doc. No. 62) and CONTINUES THE STAY this action until 2 May 15, 2025 or until further order by the Court. 3 2. Within seven (7) days of the mediation’s conclusion, the Parties shall file a “Joint 4 Post Mediation Status Report” regarding the result of the mediation. 5 3. The substance of the mediation is confidential, and no party, lawyer, or other 6 participant may record, or without approval of the Court may disclose any event, 7 including any statement confirming or denying a fact—except settlement—that occurs 8 during the mediation. 9 4. Ifthe Parties reach a settlement at the mediation, a notice of settlement shall promptly 10 be filed with the Court. See Local Rule 160(a). Dispositional documents are due no 11 more than twenty-one (21) days from the filing of the notification, absent good 12 cause. See Local Rule 160(b). 13 5. Ifthe case does not settle, then the Parties shall include in their Joint Post Mediation 14 Status Report proposed deadlines for expert discovery, dispositive motions, pretrial 15 and trial dates. 16 | Dated: _ March 31, 2025 Mihaw. Wh. foareh Zaskth 18 HELENA M. BARCH-KUCHTA 9 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Bueno v. Bass Lake Joint Union Elementary School District, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bueno-v-bass-lake-joint-union-elementary-school-district-caed-2025.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack