Buelow v. Imperial Veal & Lamb Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Buelow v. Imperial Veal & Lamb Co.

217 A.D.2d 532, 628 N.Y.S.2d 585, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7555

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 3, 1995·Published

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Sherwood, J.), dated February 2, 1994, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff provided sufficient admissible evidence from which a jury could infer that the defendants had permitted the existence of a slippery and dangerous condition, and that the condition had persisted for an extended period of time, to permit a jury to find that defendants should be charged with constructive notice thereof (see, Morales v Jollee Consolidators, 173 AD2d 315; Weisenthal v Pickman, 153 AD2d 849). Summary judgment was therefore properly denied to the defendants.

[533] We have examined the defendants’ remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Thompson, J. P., Pizzuto, Santucci and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Sherwood, J.), dated February 2, 1994, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff provided sufficient admissible evidence from which a jury could infer that the defendants had permitted the existence of a slippery and dangerous condition, and that the condition had persisted for an extended period of time, to permit a jury to find that defendants should be charged with constructive notice thereof (see, Morales v Jollee Consolidators, 173 AD2d 315; Weisenthal v Pickman, 153 AD2d 849). Summary judgment was therefore properly denied to the defendants.

[533] We have examined the defendants’ remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Thompson, J. P., Pizzuto, Santucci and Florio, JJ., concur.

Buelow v. Imperial Veal & Lamb Co., 217 A.D.2d 532, 628 N.Y.S.2d 585, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7555 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

217 A.D.2d 532 (Buelow v. Imperial Veal & Lamb Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related