Buellesfeld v. Swaim
This text of 1917 OK 570 (Buellesfeld v. Swaim) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion by
On the 10th day of March, 1913, in the county court of Kay county, Okla., the defendant in error, O. M. Swaim, recovered judgment against the plaintiff in error, M. E. Buellesfeld, for the sum of $323.35, alleged purchase price of goods and chattels alleged to have been sold to the plaintiff in error, M. E. Buelles-feld, by the defendant in error, O. M. Swaim. From said judgment the plaintiff in error, M. E. Birellesfeld, appealed.
On the 20th day of August, 1916, the plaintiff in error, M. E. Buellesfeld, filed his brief, which reasonably sustains his contention that said judgment is erroneous and should be reversed. The defendant in error, O. M. 'Swaim, has filed no brief and given no excuse for his failure to do so.
Under the rules of this court, this case must 'be reversed, with directions to grant a new trial.
By the Court: It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1917 OK 570, 168 P. 1166, 66 Okla. 302, 1917 Okla. LEXIS 213, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/buellesfeld-v-swaim-okla-1917.