Buell v. Sullivan

250 A.D. 780, 296 N.Y.S. 247, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8980
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 25, 1937·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Action upon [781]*781an extension agreement and bond for principal and interest. Defendants in their answers invoke the Moratorium Acts. Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment for principal and interest or partial judgment for interest was denied. He appeals from so much of the order as denied partial summary judgment on the item of interest. Order, in so far as appealed from, reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted for partial summary judgment for the interest accrued from July 12, 1935, with ten dollars costs. (Werbelovsky v. Rosen Bros. News Agency, Inc., 249 App. Div. 758 [2d Dept.], decided Dec. 15, 1936.) Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Adel and Close, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Buell v. Sullivan, 250 A.D. 780, 296 N.Y.S. 247, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8980 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).

250 A.D. 780 (Buell v. Sullivan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

First National Bank of Hollywood v. Freedman
244 So. 2d 183 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1971)
Central Hanover Bank v. Roslyn Estates, Inc.
266 A.D. 244 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1943)