Buell v. Sullivan
This text of 250 A.D. 780 (Buell v. Sullivan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Action upon [781]*781an extension agreement and bond for principal and interest. Defendants in their answers invoke the Moratorium Acts. Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment for principal and interest or partial judgment for interest was denied. He appeals from so much of the order as denied partial summary judgment on the item of interest. Order, in so far as appealed from, reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted for partial summary judgment for the interest accrued from July 12, 1935, with ten dollars costs. (Werbelovsky v. Rosen Bros. News Agency, Inc., 249 App. Div. 758 [2d Dept.], decided Dec. 15, 1936.) Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Adel and Close, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
250 A.D. 780, 296 N.Y.S. 247, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8980, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/buell-v-sullivan-nyappdiv-1937.