Buell v. Oil Well Supply Co.

1919 OK 296, 184 P. 572, 76 Okla. 174, 1919 Okla. LEXIS 149
Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided October 14, 1919·No. 10152·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

On motion to dismiss the appeal it appears defendant in error, Oil Wei! Supply Company, brought suit upon a prom *175 issory note against plaintiff in error, J. Garfield Buell. The petition was verified, a copy of the note attached as an exhibit and made a part of the petition. Defendant Buell by way of answer filed an unverified general denial. Upon motion of plaintiff, judgment was rendered on the pleadings, from which judgment this appeal was prosecuted. Under the provisions of section 4759, Rev. Laws 1910, the allegations of the petition must be taken as true since the answer, by way of general denial, was not verified, and on authority of Bilby v. Natl. Reserve Bank, 53 Okla. 566, 157 Pac. 1198, and Bilby v. Cochran, 47 Okla. 545, 149 Pac. 143, the appeal will be dismissed as frivolous.-

It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Buell v. Oil Well Supply Co., 1919 OK 296, 184 P. 572, 76 Okla. 174, 1919 Okla. LEXIS 149 (Okla. 1919).

1919 OK 296 (Buell v. Oil Well Supply Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Edge v. Security Building & Loan Ass'n
1935 OK 385 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1935)
Bilbo v. Sullivan
1926 OK 423 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1926)
Crabtree v. American Nat. Bank
1923 OK 110 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1923)
Burgess v. Crump
1923 OK 27 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1923)