Buehler v. Board of Supervisors

236 A.D. 747
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJuly 15, 1932
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 236 A.D. 747 (Buehler v. Board of Supervisors) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Buehler v. Board of Supervisors, 236 A.D. 747 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1932).

Opinion

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Van Kirk, P. J., and Rhodes, J., concur on the ground that the appellant was a legislative employee (Matter of Ryan v. Vars, 224 App. Div. 773), and Hinman, J., on the ground stated in opinion by him in Matter of Stowe v. Board of Supervisors of Rensselaer County (ante, pp. 212, 217), [748]*748decided herewith. Hill, J., dissents on the ground that appellant is not a legislative employee, and that the authority of Matter of Ryan v. Vars (supra) should not be extended beyond the exact position to which it related. McNamee, J., not voting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Stowe v. Board of Supervisors
236 A.D. 212 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1932)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
236 A.D. 747, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/buehler-v-board-of-supervisors-nyappdiv-1932.