Buehler v. Board of Supervisors

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Buehler v. Board of Supervisors

236 A.D. 747

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 15, 1932·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Van Kirk, P. J., and Rhodes, J., concur on the ground that the appellant was a legislative employee (Matter of Ryan v. Vars, 224 App. Div. 773), and Hinman, J., on the ground stated in opinion by him in Matter of Stowe v. Board of Supervisors of Rensselaer County (ante, pp. 212, 217), [748] decided herewith. Hill, J., dissents on the ground that appellant is not a legislative employee, and that the authority of Matter of Ryan v. Vars (supra) should not be extended beyond the exact position to which it related. McNamee, J., not voting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Van Kirk, P. J., and Rhodes, J., concur on the ground that the appellant was a legislative employee (Matter of Ryan v. Vars, 224 App. Div. 773), and Hinman, J., on the ground stated in opinion by him in Matter of Stowe v. Board of Supervisors of Rensselaer County (ante, pp. 212, 217), [748] decided herewith. Hill, J., dissents on the ground that appellant is not a legislative employee, and that the authority of Matter of Ryan v. Vars (supra) should not be extended beyond the exact position to which it related. McNamee, J., not voting.

Buehler v. Board of Supervisors, 236 A.D. 747 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1932).

Pincite

236 A.D. 747 (Buehler v. Board of Supervisors) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related