BUDRY MICHEL v. STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 12, 2018·No. 13-1123·Published

Opinion

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

BUDRY MICHEL, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

No. 4D13-1123

[December 12, 2018]

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Barbara Anne McCarthy, Judge; L.T. Case No. 93-19586 CF10A.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Paul E. Petillo, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Matthew Steven Ocksrider, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

In State v. Michel, 43 Fla. L. Weekly S298 (Fla. July 12, 2018), the Florida Supreme Court quashed this Court’s decision in Michel v. State, 204 So. 3d 101 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016), and concluded that no Eighth Amendment violation was shown in this case.

Accordingly, we affirm the trial court’s denial of Appellant’s motion for postconviction relief.

Affirmed.

WARNER, DAMOORGIAN and CIKLIN, JJ., concur.

* * *

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BUDRY MICHEL v. STATE OF FLORIDA, (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

BUDRY MICHEL v. STATE OF FLORIDA (BUDRY MICHEL v. STATE OF FLORIDA) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Michel v. State
204 So. 3d 101 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2016)