Budrow v. Lynch

7 Conn. Supp. 413, 1939 Conn. Super. LEXIS 139
Connecticut Superior Court·Decided October 31, 1939·No. File No. 56402·Published

Opinion

DICKENSON, J.

While in terms the defendants ask for a judgment of nonsuit, in effect the request is for judgment on the pleadings, it appearing from these that an amendment after demurrer sustained was stricken from the file for the reason that it did not change the cause of action set up in the original complaint.

While the plaintiff had twenty days in which to file an [414]*414amendment, he did this, it was expunged, and under section 99 of the Practice Book (1934) the demurrer sustained “removes from the case the cause of action.” Nor is judgment under these circumstances one of nonsuit. Manghue vs. Reaney, 99 Conn. 662.

Judgment on the pleadings is directed for this defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Budrow v. Lynch, 7 Conn. Supp. 413, 1939 Conn. Super. LEXIS 139 (Colo. Ct. App. 1939).

7 Conn. Supp. 413 (Budrow v. Lynch) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Manghue v. Reaney
122 A. 566 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1923)