Budrow v. Grand Union Co.
This text of 99 N.E.2d 559 (Budrow v. Grand Union Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment of the Appellate Division reversed and that of Trial Term affirmed, with costs in this court and in the Appellate Division. There is evidence from which the negligence of defendant and the causation of the accident by that negligence may be reasonably inferred. (Betzag v. Gulf Oil Corp., 298 N. Y. 358; Bernstein v. Greenfield, 281 N. Y. 77; Cornbrooks v. Terminal Barber Shops, Inc., 282 N. Y. 217.) No opinion.
Concur: Loughban, Ch. J., Lewis, Conway, Desmond, Dye, Fuld and Froessel, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
99 N.E.2d 559, 302 N.Y. 804, 1951 N.Y. LEXIS 938, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/budrow-v-grand-union-co-ny-1951.